Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Ethical Dilemma

I needed to create an ethical dilemma on the issue on which I chose, which was that Russian prisons are breeding grounds for tuberculosis. Here's the hypothetical scene that involves this issue:

On this day, a prisoner has finished serving their sentence and is waiting to be released. Before their release, their results from the prison clinic return and confirm that they have Tuberculosis. If the person is released from prison they're going to directly infect and kill seven other people through Tuberculosis, but if it's decided that the person should be isolated, it would have to be in prison with the other infected inmates to avoid the chance of spreading the disease through transporting the person. Due to the isolation with infected inmates, the person will never get better and will die in prison. Should we let the person go and infect and kill seven people? Or do we isolate the person in prison, effectively killing the prisoner even though the person has already served their time?

Information in support of release:

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-WumllRPLI (explains the evolution of tuberculosis in prisons and that it that might eventually give the person a more dangerous strand of tuberculosis)
  • http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/prison2home02/haney.htm#II (psychological impact done by prison)
  • http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/ (how deadly TB is (for the prisoner))


Information for on support of isolation:

  • http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/ (how deadly TB is (for the population if the prisoner infects others))
  • http://www.cdc.gov/TB/TOPIC/basics/default.htm (how TB spreads over the globe and country)
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-WumllRPLI (explains how easily TB spreads)

No comments:

Post a Comment