This semester, I have been working on a process to work towards addressing an issue related to food production. I have learned a lot and will be uploading the documentary I made with three other people relating to my process below and the process the others in my group went through. Here is what I went through in order to address this problem:
1. What’s the problem?
Pests in United States
agricultural farms are becoming resistant to insecticides used on them.
2a. What are the causes/drivers of this
problem?
- Farmers
- Public
- Pesticide Manufacturers
- Pests
b. What are the root causes of the
drivers?-use the 5-why’s strategy
Farmers: Farmers are using pesticides that the pests
are becoming resistant to -> They need to keep their crops safe -> Pests
feed constantly off of them -> The pests have a constant supply of food
-> The farmers are practicing monocropping -> There is a high demand for
certain crops
Public: The public is making farmers use pesticides on
their crops -> the farmer has to make more crops -> The public is
demanding more crops -> Their population is increasing -> There is more
food for them to consume -> More food is being produced
Pesticide Manufacturers: Provide farmers with pesticides -> They
make money off producing pesticides -> Farmers need a way to protect their
crops -> Pests are eating their crops -> There’s an abundance of them
-> Farmers are monocropping
Pests: Pest are the reason farmers are using
pesticides-> Farmers don’t like them -> The pests are consuming the crops
-> They have an easily accessible supply -> There’s monocropping ->
Farmers only produce certain types of crops
c.Who is impacted by the problem and how are
they impacted (this includes both positive and negative impacts)?
Pesticide Using Farmers:
Have to buy increasing
amounts of pesticides in order to keep up with the resistance in pests. This
would cost them more and more money and then once the pest was fully resistant
they would need to purchase a new type of pesticide, costing them more money.
The pests would also be feeding on their crops unopposed, causing a loss of
money due to not being able to sell as much crops.
Public: Would have crops that have been heavily treated
with pesticides if the farmer can sell them, and if the farmers lose a lot of
crops prices would go up due to there being less crops in stock from farms to
sell.
Pesticide Manufacturers:
Would be making more
money because farmers would keep purchasing pesticides to use on their farms.
Pests: The pesticides would be killing out the weaker
of the pests and would leave the ones immune to the pesticides to breed and
produce a new generation of offspring immune to the pesticides. The immune
pests would have all the food they needed.
Grocery Stores: Grocery stores might be less stocked on produce
depending on how much the farmer sells and the prices would go up as a result.
The store might also run the risk of losing money if they aren’t as in stock
with produce.
Organic Farmers: Organic farmers that don’t use pesticides might
have more opportunities to sell their products since the farmers using
pesticides are decreasing and causing less competition. The organic farmers
could make more money off of this than they usually do.
Bees: Pesticides are suspected of causing Colony
Collapse Disorder
d. How can we quantify the causes of the
problem and the impacts of the problem?
Pesticide Using Farmers:
Cost of the most common
pesticide, how much pesticides the average farmer uses annually, the percentage
of farmers that practice monocropping, the average yield for farmers who
practice monocropping vs. farmers who don’t practice monocropping, how much
pests account for in terms of crop loss
Public: Annual consumption of produce in the U.S., U.S.
population growth, produce demand in the U.S., how much the U.S. consumer
spends on produce annually.
Pesticide Manufacturers:
The price of pesticides,
percentage of farmers that use pesticides, how often farmers purchase
pesticides
Pests: Percentage of farms with pests, percentage of
crops pests consume on farms that use pesticides vs. farms that don’t
Grocery Stores: Annual purchase of produce to stores annually,
percent of profits from produce
Organic Farmers: Average organic farmer salary
e. Who is already working to address the problem
and what are they doing?
Exacto Inc.-Created Synthex DC 5 AMS, a combination of herbicides designed to help ease
herbicide resistance
Organic Farmers- Don’t use
pesticides and so avoid the problem of pesticide resistance
Beyond Pesticides- Program
working to rid the world of pesticides “by identifying the risks of
conventional pest management practices and promoting non-chemical and least
toxic management alternatives. The organization's primary goal is to effect
change through local action, assisting individuals and community-based
organizations to stimulate discussion on the hazards of toxic pesticides, while
providing information of safe alternatives.”
f. Select a root cause
of a driver of the problem you identified that you will address moving forward
in the 7-step process.
Monoculture farming
requires pesticide use.
3. Envisioning the
problem in 5, 10, and 20 years
5 Years
It’s been five years and
the issue of pesticide resistance in pests is becoming less of an issue. Farms
all over the United States have come up with a few solutions to help aid the
problem, though it is far from eradicated. Farmers are realizing that
pesticides are just going to keep costing them more and more money, so many
farmers have turned to organic farming.
Since these solutions
took a while, the price of produce has gone up and the public is not as
satisfied, pesticide manufacturers are not making as much money since there is
less demand for their products, and pests are not required to have immunity to
pesticides to survive, so there is a mix of resistant and non-resistant pests.
Bees have also been
making positive progress. Colony Collapse Disorder has become less common since
many farmers have turned to organic farming, and if they haven’t they have at
least have stopped monocropping which has provided the bees with more to choose
from.
10 Year
It’s been ten years since the problem with pest
resistance was beginning to be solved and things are much better. Farms in the
United States have come up with a variety of solutions so that pest resistance
isn’t such a problem. Most farmers are organic so that a bug’s resistance
doesn’t even matter, but some farmers still stick to pesticides.
Regardless of whether or
not the farm uses pesticides, most farms now practice having refugia on their
farms. This is where there is a section separate from the important crops on
the farm that provides as a distraction from the important crops so the pests
don’t eat as much of those.
As a result, the price
of produce has decreased to the public’s relief, so many people who didn’t
originally have access to nutritious food now have access to it. Pest
resistance is less severe on pesticide using farms and not important on organic
farms, so pests are still thriving, though pest manufacturers are making less
money than ever. In the opposition, farmers are making more money, leading to
less debt and stress on their part.
20 Years
It’s been twenty years since pest resistance began to
really be solved, and things are steadily improving. Pest resistance is hardly
important on farms anymore and people are able to move on to more pressing
issues.
Produce prices have remained about the same due to
farmers not having to buy pesticide costs but gas prices for transport have
increased. Farmers are still making more money, pests have a constant food
supply, and pesticide manufacturers aren’t making as much money. Overall,
solving pesticide resistance would be beneficial for many people in many
different ways.
4. What could we do
about the problem and why would we do it?
a. Who is already
addressing the issue of monoculture & what are they doing (local &
global)?
African Journal of Food
Science and Technology: Testing out refugia, which is basically where you have
your crops you intend to use, and of to the side of your field you have a
smaller section for the pests to run rampant in. This way there is less
pesticide resistant bugs on the normal field, so if you spray it with
pesticides and the immune bugs reproduce, there is less immune pests than there
would be if there was monocropping.
Matina
Donaldson-Matasci: Social insect behavior researcher at U of A who proposes
that we
“convince
farmers to plant a wider variety of crops and let weeds grow on crop margins,
and persuade landowners to maintain wild habitat near agricultural land.”
because monocropping badly affects bees.
b.Similar root causes of
other problems in other places and things being done I could learn from
Extraction of minerals
from soil is a problem in farming as well. The nutrients from the soil on
farms are less every round of crops. The root cause of this problem that can be
solved is that the soil isn’t getting a break from crops so the nutrients
deplete for the next round. One of the solutions to this is crop rotation. In
crop rotation the field is divided into four parts, three are used immediately
to grow three different types of crops, and the remaining one is the “resting
field”. After the three fields’ crops are harvested, the crops rotate over one
plot so that there is a new resting field each time. From this we can learn
that instead of monoculture, we might also want to consider using more than one
crop.
Another problem has been
Colony Collapse Disorder in bees. One possible root cause has been a type of
pesticides called neonicotinoids as well as monocropping. It has been
suggested that these brands of pesticides quit being used and that farmers
plant flowers around their crops as the bees need flowers to survive. From this
I learned that bees are also something I need to take into consideration when
developing my strategy.
c.Gather information
from stakeholders on what they think should be done to address the root cause
(environmental, social, economic)
d.Strategies
- Companion Gardening: Farmers
would plant other plants amongst their plant they’re going to sell. This
would ensure that the pests would have more things to go after and
pesticides would not be needed. This would also encourage pollination and
help repel pests if certain strong herbs were planted.
- Refugia: Refugia would maintain
a separate area off the farm where pests could go to feed. Not all pests
would go, but this would divert some away and cause less damage.
Pesticides could still be sprayed on the original field and since there’s
less pesticide resistant animals, and therefore they would breed less
resistance into the next generation.
e. System to
quantitatively evaluate strategies to align with vision (positive economic,
social, and environmental)
- Economics: How much money it
will cost the farmers per year, how much money it will be compared to the
normal cost of farming per year, how much the farmers can afford to spend
per year, how much crop will this new process yield per year.
- Social: Visitors to the farm
within a year compared to a year when this plan was not in place, how much
extra time (if any) do the farmers have because of the new plan.
- Environmental: How much (if
any) pesticides will be used with this plan within a month, how many
pesticide resistant bugs will this leave on the farm after a year, how
many bees and butterflies will there be on the farm after a year.
f.Pick a strategy
I pick using companion
gardening.
5. What will we do about
the problem and how will we accomplish this?
- For this problem we need to
implement the selected strategy on a farm that does not currently practice
companion gardening. We need to figure out which plants of theirs are
being eaten by pests and suggest compatible plants that will repel the
pests. If they use pesticides, we need to encourage them not to do so and
explain how companion gardening works. We will also encourage them to
plant flowers within the farm to help promote bees to help with natural
pollination.
a. What resources do you
need and how will you use these resources?
We’re going to need a
farm that is having trouble with pests and compatible plants and flowers for
their farms to use. If we need to help plant, we will need soil as well.
b. Who in the community
will you be involved with and how will you be involved with them?
I contacted Crooked Sky
Farms and Maya’s Farm but neither replied so I need to try to get in touch with
some others.
c. A specific timeline
indicating who will be doing what and when?
Yosin, Luis, Brandon,
and I were going to go to a farm to try to get them to practice companion
gardening, but none of the farms responded, so we ended up trying to get people
to do companion gardening on a smaller scale. We plan to go to Fry’s and try to
interest people in our flyers on companion gardening and convince them to
practice it on their own.
d. A way to evaluate how
well your strategy is working and a plan to implement the evaluating of your
strategy and any revisions/changes you will need to make if things are not
working?
·
How many people agreed
to begin practicing companion gardening or inform other people of it: the whole
purpose was to get people to garden by themselves so that we could reduce all
of the negative impacts caused by pesticides and monocultures.
If things are not
working, we will use our guidelines listed above to help get us back on the
right track and communicate with the people we are working with.
e. A detailed plan for
how your strategy will be sustained into the future?
We hope that in the future we can
actually work on a large scale and get farmers to practice companion gardening,
but for now we influenced around eleven people to practice companion gardening
and inform their friends of it. This strategy can be sustained into the future
because we gave the people we surveyed charts on what plants go well with what
so they can plant and all the negative impacts of monoculture and what
companion gardening can do for them.
7. Reflect and adjust
For our implementation
to solve our problems, we decided to try to get people to support and practice
companion gardening which is a form of organic farming, by passing out flyers
on its benefits and a chart that showed many types of produce that work well
with one and another; for the implementation we went to a Fry’s on 67th ave and
Camelback on April 26th. Some people didn’t want to talk to us, but some were
open to asking questions and giving their own input on companion gardening and
other environmental issues *cut to interview with Joy*
We hoped
that by doing this, we could get people to plant their own gardens and reduce
the use of pesticides on farms or home gardens, reduce pesticide resistance in
pests, reduce occurrences of CCD, and severe invasive species problems on
farms. We might have only influenced a little over ten people that day, but we
have hope that this can lead to something bigger. After all that is 10 more
people that know more about companion gardening then before we started our
implementation.
We also created a survey
to help us see if what we were doing was helping people to understand what
companion gardening is, and also to see how many people already knew what companion
gardening was before we talked to them. We asked them a variety of questions
and here are our results:
As a group we started
separately, but through connecting our problems through the lense of
biodiversity, we were able to work together to try to lessen an issue. We
started on the level of individuals to try to spread the message of the need of
biodiversity on farms and change the opinion of the people. We might’ve changed
a few minds. But we feel to really make a difference; we need to take this
project to a grander scale. To do this we could advocate for actual change on
farms by showing them statistics of what people think of companion gardening
and all the benefit it could do to their farm.
No comments:
Post a Comment